#Vigilance_Investigation_against_Gyanesh_Kumar_A_New_Face_of_Political_Vengeance.
The Kerala government's move to launch a vigilance investigation against Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar, reviving allegations of corruption during his tenure as Public Works Secretary in Kerala, is questionable and politically motivated. Vigilance had previously investigated complaints related to this for several years. The cases were closed in 2012 due to insufficient evidence to prove the allegations.
In that case, what is the urgency of reviving allegations that are almost two decades old now? If new evidence has been received, let them be examined legally. But dusting off an investigation that was closed earlier in the new political situation will naturally raise doubts.
The Congress-led government in Kerala, in the backdrop of the nationwide protests against Gyanesh Kumar by the Congress, the opposition Indi Alliance and the PATA party, has strengthened the suspicion that the vigilance investigation is part of political revenge. The situation in which the state administration is being used for a political struggle against the head of the Election Commission, a constitutionally independent institution, is not a decoration for democracy.
If there is disagreement with the decisions of the Election Commissioner, there are constitutional and legal ways to question it. Instead, using old allegations that have been locked up as political weapons will affect the dignity of democratic institutions and the credibility of investigative agencies alike. No one should object to conducting an impartial investigation based on new evidence; but the tendency to use vigilance for political interests should be strongly condemned.
If this is the government's policy, it is likely that the ministers and secretaries in power today will face many vigilance investigations in the future.

