On EVM

#Inconsistent criticism against EVM.

The repeated criticism of Electronic Voting Machines (EVMs) by the INDI alliance, particularly when electoral outcomes do not favor them, reflects a concerning inconsistency. While questioning the integrity of the electoral process is valid if genuine evidence exists, selectively raising doubts only after defeats erodes public trust in democracy. 

When the same machines deliver victories to their candidates, their silence suggests political opportunism rather than principled concern. This flip-flop undermines the credibility of their arguments and may mislead voters into believing that the system is inherently flawed, even in the absence of proof.

Despite court warnings against making baseless allegations about EVMs, some leaders continue to fuel suspicions, which is not only irresponsible but also dangerous. Such rhetoric sows unnecessary doubts in the minds of the public and disrespects the efforts of the Election Commission and the democratic framework of the country. 

If political parties have legitimate concerns, they should address them through legal and institutional channels rather than resorting to public mudslinging. This practice of blaming the system only when losing is indeed ugly and must be discouraged in the interest of preserving the integrity and dignity of Indian democracy.

-K A Solaman