External counsels

#External counsels

The issue of appointing highly paid advocates by the Kerala Government, despite having its own Advocate General and assistants, raises concerns about transparency and accountability within the legal system. 

This kind of practice potentially indicates favoritism or corruption, as it diverts public funds towards external legal counsel when the government already has legal experts in-house. The decision to overlook internal resources in favour of expensive external hires suggests a lack of trust in the capabilities of the Advocate General's office or possible ulterior motives behind the selection process.

Furthermore, the use of highly paid external advocates could also compromise the quality of legal representation provided to the government. While these advocates may possess significant expertise, their loyalty and commitment to the state's interests may be questioned compared to the government's own legal team. This situation could lead to conflicts of interest or the prioritization of personal gain over the public good. Additionally, the exorbitant fees paid to these external advocates drain public coffers and may hinder the government's ability to allocate resources to other pressing needs. The chances for getting  commission from the fee paid to external legal experts cannot be ruled out.

It is the responsibility of the government to promote accountability and fairness in legal appointments. And in doing so the government can uphold the integrity of its legal system.

-K A Solaman