Unwelcome oratory

#Unwelcome oratory

The clash between Kerala University's Vice Chancellor's directive and the controversial speech by CPM MP Brittas has stirred a tempest in the academic teacup. It raises questions of authority and electoral ethics.

 As the Poll panel sought answers, the Registrar's report saying no poll violation in Brittas speech is surprising. The crux of the matter lies not just in Brittas' political prowess but in the fundamental balance of power within academic institutions. Does a Vice Chancellor's decree hold sway in the face of political privilege?. Does the ivory tower tremble beneath the weight of partisan rhetoric?

 Brittas' unwelcome oratory dance on the delicate line between academic freedom and electoral integrity,. The whole episode 

Ieaves  observers to wonder:whose rules outweigh in the University. Brittas is not a 

Martin Luther King Jr. to make thought-provoking speech  to bring forth Indiawide change.

-K A Solaman

Cat and mouse game

#Cat and mouse game

The scenario paints a fascinating picture of the cat-and-mouse game between the Enforcement Directorate (ED) and S N Sasidharan Kartha, Managing Director of Cochin Minerals and Rutile Limited (CMRL). 

Kartha's bold move of filing cases in HCs against the ED showcases his confidence. It might be  perhaps fueled by his perceived safety at home. However, likening the ED's actions to throwing a stone ahead of a running dog implies that Kartha underestimates the ED's intelligence and determination. It's a classic case of the hunter becoming the hunted, where Kartha's perceived safety might just be a temporary illusion in the face of the ED's relentless pursuit of justice. ED is now questioning  Kartha at his home.

The unfolding drama promises to be a gripping spectacle of wit and strategy between two formidable adversaries.

-K A Solaman

Surey circus

#Survey Circus.

As we gear up for yet another election season in India, the cacophony of poll surveys has once again filled the airwaves, promising insights into the minds of the electorate. However, the recent contradictory findings regarding the upcoming Kerala Legislative Assembly elections highlight a glaring truth: poll surveys in India are often nothing more than a speculative circus. These sureys leave voters dizzied and confused rather than informed.

The fickleness of these surveys undermines their credibility and renders them little more than entertainment fodder. The divergent predictions from various agencies not only reflect the inherent biases and methodologies at play but also sow seeds of doubt and skepticism among the electorate. It  ultimately erode the very foundation of democratic decision-making.

 It's high time we reconsider the relevance of these poll surveys and perhaps even contemplate their banishment from the electoral discourse to ensure a more sober and substantive public debate. After all, in a democracy, the voice of the people should not be drowned out by the noise of unreliable statistics and wishful thinking.

-K A Solaman

Selective charity

#Selective charity

The selective intervention of charity workers in cases of individuals facing death sentences raises serious questions about the consistency and integrity of their humanitarian efforts. While the release of Abdul Rahim through the payment of a hefty ransom showcases a seemingly altruistic act, the underlying motives of individuals like Boche (Roby Chemmannur), who is a gold merchant, cast doubt on the genuineness of their intentions. 

The disparity in treatment between Abdul Rahim and Nimisha Priya, who remains incarcerated in Yemen facing a similar fate, underscores a troubling pattern of selective assistance based on personal interests rather than genuine humanitarian concern.

This discrepancy not only highlights the inherent flaws in the current system of relying on private individuals to secure the release of prisoners but also exposes the ethical dilemmas faced by charity workers who may prioritize their own agendas over equitable justice. The case underscores the need for greater transparency and accountability within the realm of charitable interventions, as well as a reevaluation of the efficacy of relying on individual benevolence to address systemic issues within the criminal justice system...

 Ultimately, the disparity in treatment between Abdul Rahim and Nimisha Priya serves as a stark reminder of the complexities and challenges inherent in navigating the intersection of philanthropy and justice.

- K A Solaman

Welfare pension

#Welfare #pension

The Kerala State Government's stance before the High Court regarding the social security pension (SSP) is deeply flawed and unjust. By asserting that the collection of cess for SSP does not make the pension statutory and claiming that such pensions cannot be considered a matter of right, the government is neglecting its fundamental duty. It is the prime duty of the government to provide pension for its citizens, especially the elderly who have contributed to society throughout their lives.

It is erroneous for the government to label welfare pension as mere assistance rather than a rightful entitlement. Citizens contribute to the state's revenue through taxes throughout their working lives, and it is only fair that they receive support in their old age when they can no longer earn a livelihood. Pension schemes are not charity. They are a social contract between the government and its people, ensuring a dignified life for all citizens, particularly during their retirement years.

Moreover, the government's reliance on fuel cess for funding pensions further highlights the absurdity of its position. By collecting taxes specifically designated for social security purposes, the government acknowledges its obligation to provide for its citizens' welfare. To argue otherwise before the court is  contradictory. It undermines the very principles of social justice and solidarity upon which such schemes are built. Therefore, it is imperative for the Kerala State Government to reconsider its stance and uphold the rights of its elderly citizens to dignified and secure livelihoods in their later years.

-K A Solaman

Ruthless Pursuit

Ruthless pursuit
The rifts between political fathers and sons often stem from a complex interplay of personal ambition and generational shifts. Sons may perceive their fathers' leadership styles as outdated or incompatible with contemporary political realities. The latest example is the case. of Anil Antony and his father A K Antony.

This kind of approach from sons leads to a desire to distance themselves and assert their own identities. This can be exacerbated by the pressure to carve out their own political careers and the temptation to align with rival factions for expedient gains.

However, such actions carry significant personal and familial consequences, and straining relationships. The betrayal of familial ties for political expediency reflects a ruthless pursuit of power at the expense of integrity.

By publicly denouncing their fathers, these sons risk alienating themselves from their family's political legacy and betraying the trust placed in them. This unfaithful act not only undermines the familial foundation upon which their political careers were built. The pursuit of short-term political gains at the expense of familial ties leaves a bitter legacy of betrayal and regret. The common people will not trust such political sons in their future pursuits.
- K A Salaman

Use of fireworks

U

se offireworks

As the scorching heat intensifies and reports of fires erupting in various places become more frequent, it's crucial to exercise extreme caution, especially with the approaching festival of fireworks, Vishu. 

The combination of hot weather and fireworks poses a serious risk of igniting uncontrollable fires that can cause immense damage to property and endanger lives. Despite the evident danger, it's disheartening to see many people disregarding the importance of fire safety measures during this season.

To both the public and law enforcement authorities, one has to urge a collective effort to prioritize fire safety and enforce stringent regulations on the use of fireworks. It's imperative for individuals to understand the potential consequences of their actions with firecrackers. They. should act responsibly by refraining from engaging in activities that could augment the already precarious situation.

 It is to be implored that the police to intensify patrols and vigilance to prevent unauthorized and unsafe use of fireworks. This should ensure the safety and well-being of the community during this challenging time.

-K A Solaman

Stain on values

#Stain on values.

The Kerala government's repeated targeting of honest officials like Dr. M Rema and Dr. Sisa, simply because they refuse to bend to political pressures, is appalling. It also a clear violation of their rights. 

By dragging these principled individuals into cumbersome court proceedings, the government is not only wasting valuable time and resources but also sending a chilling message to other officials who dare to stand up for integrity and fairness.

It's evident that the Kerala government's actions are driven by a blatant disregard for meritocracy. And it is an unhealthy allegiance to political outfits like the SFI. Instead of appreciating officials who prioritize principles over partisanship, the government chooses to intimidate and harass them. This creates a toxic work environment where honesty is punished and corruption thrives.

The recent decision by the Kerala High Court to quash disciplinary actions against Dr. Rema is a testament to the government's failure to uphold justice and respect the rule of law. It's high time for the authorities to stop using the judiciary as a tool to suppress dissent. The government should start prioritizing the well-being of honest officials who strive to serve the people with integrity and dedication. Anything less would be a betrayal of the public trust. And it is  a stain on Kerala's democratic values.

K A Solaman

Father & Son

#Antony and Son

AK Antony's statement calling for the defeat of his son, Anil Antony, the BJP candidate in Pathanamthitta, is indeed bold but unexpected. While on the surface, Antony's stance may seem admirable it raises questions about the underlying dynamics within his own party and family. This public disapproval could indicate internal strife  within his family.

 Antony's statement challenges traditional notions of familial loyalty and dynastic politics prevalent in Indian politics. In a society where family connections often play a crucial role in political advancement, Antony's stance could be seen as a departure from the norm.. It highlights the complexities of familial relationships in the political arena.

Seemingly, the "Krupasanam Amma" rejected the request of Elizabeth, Antony's wife, who pleaded good prospects for her son. Antony and his son are not a role model for all fathers and sons in Kerala.

-K A Salaman