#New #legal strategy
When we see the confidence of those who provide legal advice to the government, we wonder if our legal system is still only on books. If the verdict is not acceptable, cast doubt on the judge herself, declare the court biased, and then push it all to the public under the label of 'legal advice': If this is the new legal strategy, the appellate courts could have been closed and Facebook posts would have been enough.
What legal sense is there in preparing a public charge sheet against the judge who pronounced the verdict in the actress assault case, even though it is said that there is serious evidence, avoiding the appeal, which is the only legal avenue to examine it? If it is the court's fault that the evidence was rejected, then it should be proven within the court, not in channels and on the streets.
Forgetting the fact that the Supreme Court has already taken a clear stand on the memory card issue, raising the same card again as a political slogan is not a legal battle, but a mockery of the law. It would be good to look back at the history of how many cases the government has lost so far on the basis of such ‘legal advice’
There are only three months left before this govt. leave power. So why not stop the practice of challenging the legal system? Otherwise, the government will end up answering not to the courts but to the people themselves; in the face of court indifference and widespread ridicule.

